Not all sources deserve equal weight, so we rank them, and we lean on the top of the list far harder than the bottom. Understanding this hierarchy tells you why our numbers sometimes differ from a random affiliate table.
At the top sits primary evidence we can see for ourselves: the in-game Game Rules panels and the behaviour we watch in the demo. These are the closest thing to the game telling us the truth, so a figure read straight off the panel, like the 96.55% RTP or the $0.20 to $240.00 bet range, overrides anything second-hand.
Next come the studio's own published materials. Pragmatic Play is a licensed B2B studio with Malta Gaming Authority and UK Gambling Commission supplier licences, and its games are RNG-tested by Gaming Laboratories International, so its official game page is a strong corroborating source. We link to it once where it belongs. When the official page and the demo disagree, for example the official 96.51% versus the demo's 96.55%, we report both rather than pick one silently.
Below that we place independent aggregators and databases, used only for context and always unnamed. They are useful for a rough sense of how the wider audience scores a game, so we might say aggregators land it around 8 out of 10, but we never treat a single third-party figure as fact. At the very bottom sit casino promo pages and affiliate copy, which we treat as marketing until a primary source backs the claim. If nothing does, we write that the number is not confirmed.